2003 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 2.0 DiTD (90 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.25/100
2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 i LX/SE (111 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
MazdaMakeFord
323ModelFocus
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
12,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
178 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
90 HPPower111 HP
220 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,4 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationFord Focus
4200 mmLength4442 mm
1705 mmWidth1699 mm
1410 mmHeight1430 mm
1175 KgWeight1190 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2616 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…