DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Daewoo Rezzo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeDaewoo
323ModelRezzo
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,2 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
187 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower136 HP
230 NmTorque184 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption12 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4290 mmLength4350 mm
1705 mmWidth1750 mm
1420 mmHeight1580 mm
1195 KgWeight1270 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Daewoo Rezzo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…