DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Daewoo Rezzo vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

DaewooMakeMazda
RezzoModel323
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,4 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
200 km/hTop speed187 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower101 HP
184 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4350 mmLength4290 mm
1750 mmWidth1705 mm
1580 mmHeight1420 mm
1270 KgWeight1195 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Daewoo Rezzo and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…