DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda MX-6
MazdaMakeMazda
323ModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda MX-6
12,2 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
187 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
101 HPPower115 HP
230 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda MX-6
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption—
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda MX-6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda MX-6
4290 mmLength4615 mm
1705 mmWidth1750 mm
1420 mmHeight1310 mm
1195 KgWeight1120 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…