DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Renault Kangoo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

43.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
323ModelKangoo
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

16,9 s0–100 km/h16,2 s
168 km/hTop speed142 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
71 HPPower80 HP
128 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength3995 mm
1705 mmWidth1663 mm
1410 mmHeight1894 mm
1150 KgWeight1405 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Renault Kangoo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…