DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeRenault
323ModelLaguna
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
194 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1783 cc
114 HPPower120 HP
161 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4315 mmLength4510 mm
1705 mmWidth1750 mm
1410 mmHeight1430 mm
1125 KgWeight1225 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 2000 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…