DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Renault Laguna vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeMazda
LagunaModel323
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
202 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1783 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
120 HPPower114 HP
165 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4510 mmLength4315 mm
1750 mmWidth1705 mm
1430 mmHeight1410 mm
1225 KgWeight1125 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Renault Laguna and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…