2003 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.8 i 16V (114 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Renault Scenic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Scenic
Renault Scenic 1.9 dTi (98 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Scenic
MazdaMakeRenault
323ModelScenic
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Scenic
10,8 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
194 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
114 HPPower98 HP
161 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Scenic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Scenic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationRenault Scenic
4200 mmLength4425 mm
1705 mmWidth1775 mm
1410 mmHeight1720 mm
1115 KgWeight1485 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…