DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 323
MGMakeMazda
ZSModel323
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 323
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
19 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
117 HPPower114 HP
160 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/45 R17Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationMazda 323
4520 mmLength4200 mm
1700 mmWidth1705 mm
1390 mmHeight1410 mm
1125 KgWeight1115 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…