2003 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.8 i 16V (114 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 1.6 16V T.S. (120 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
MazdaMakeAlfa Romeo
323Model156
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
10,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
114 HPPower120 HP
161 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption11,4 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/65R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
4200 mmLength4430 mm
1705 mmWidth1745 mm
1410 mmHeight1415 mm
1115 KgWeight1230 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…