DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
MazdaMakeMG
323ModelZS
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
10,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
194 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
114 HPPower117 HP
161 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationMG ZS
4200 mmLength4520 mm
1705 mmWidth1700 mm
1410 mmHeight1390 mm
1115 KgWeight1125 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…