DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 323 vs 1994 Fiat Croma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationFiat Croma
MazdaMakeFiat
323ModelCroma
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationFiat Croma
11,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1929 cc
103 HPPower94 HP
155 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationFiat Croma
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationFiat Croma
4260 mmLength4520 mm
1680 mmWidth1760 mm
1340 mmHeight1430 mm
1120 KgWeight1240 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 323 and 1994 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…