DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Fiat Croma vs 1994 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 323
FiatMakeMazda
CromaModel323
1994Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 323
12,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
180 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1929 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
94 HPPower103 HP
200 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
6 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears—
175/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Fiat CromaSpecificationMazda 323
4520 mmLength4260 mm
1760 mmWidth1680 mm
1430 mmHeight1340 mm
1240 KgWeight1120 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Fiat Croma and 1994 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…