2002 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.6 i 16V (95 Hp) 2002Overall Score47.25/100
2002 Mazda 323 vs 2002 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 DTI 16V (75 Hp) 2002Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
323ModelCombo
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
14,2 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
170 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
95 HPPower75 HP
143 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
11,3 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
4390 mmLength4320 mm
1705 mmWidth1685 mm
1410 mmHeight1800 mm
1115 KgWeight1260 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2751 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Mazda 323 and 2002 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…