2002 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 DTI 16V (75 Hp) 2002Overall Score46.25/100
2002 Opel Combo vs 2002 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.6 i 16V (95 Hp) 2002Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
OpelMakeMazda
ComboModel323
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
15,5 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
155 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
75 HPPower95 HP
165 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
4320 mmLength4390 mm
1685 mmWidth1705 mm
1800 mmHeight1410 mm
1260 KgWeight1115 Kg
2751 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Opel Combo and 2002 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…