DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Kia Sephia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sephia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Sephia
MazdaMakeKia
323ModelSephia
1998Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Sephia
12,0 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
177 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1489 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
88 HPPower88 HP
132 NmTorque135 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Sephia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption10,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Sephia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Sephia
4340 mmLength4427 mm
1710 mmWidth1711 mm
1420 mmHeight1415 mm
1070 KgWeight1065 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda 323 and 2000 Kia Sephia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sephia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…