DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Sephia vs 1998 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Sephia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia SephiaSpecificationMazda 323
KiaMakeMazda
SephiaModel323
2000Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Kia SephiaSpecificationMazda 323
11,8 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
180 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1489 cc
88 HPPower88 HP
135 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia SephiaSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia SephiaSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R13 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia SephiaSpecificationMazda 323
4427 mmLength4340 mm
1711 mmWidth1710 mm
1415 mmHeight1420 mm
1065 KgWeight1070 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Sephia and 1998 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Sephia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…