DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Honda Civic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Civic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.

46.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeHonda
323ModelCivic
1998Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
177 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1489 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
88 HPPower125 HP
132 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 TTyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4340 mmLength4325 mm
1710 mmWidth1695 mm
1420 mmHeight1390 mm
1070 KgWeight1155 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Mazda 323 and 2000 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…