2003 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.5 i 16V (88 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
2003 Mazda 323 vs 2003 Nissan March Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Nissan
March
Nissan March 1.5 Di (65 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationNissan March
MazdaMakeNissan
323ModelMarch
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationNissan March
11,9 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
177 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
88 HPPower65 HP
132 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationNissan March
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationNissan March
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationNissan March
4200 mmLength3715 mm
1705 mmWidth1660 mm
1410 mmHeight1525 mm
1115 KgWeight980 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Mazda 323 and 2003 Nissan March approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…