2003 • Nissan
March
Nissan March 1.5 Di (65 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
2003 Nissan March vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.5 i 16V (88 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan MarchSpecificationMazda 323
NissanMakeMazda
MarchModel323
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Nissan MarchSpecificationMazda 323
17,0 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
155 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1461 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
65 HPPower88 HP
160 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan MarchSpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan MarchSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan MarchSpecificationMazda 323
3715 mmLength4200 mm
1660 mmWidth1705 mm
1525 mmHeight1410 mm
980 KgWeight1115 Kg
2430 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Nissan March and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…