2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.3 i 16V (73 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Mazda 323 vs 1999 Toyota Starlet Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Toyota
Starlet
Toyota Starlet 1.3i 16V (75 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationToyota Starlet
MazdaMakeToyota
323ModelStarlet
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationToyota Starlet
14,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
167 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1332 cc
73 HPPower75 HP
108 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationToyota Starlet
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationToyota Starlet
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationToyota Starlet
4200 mmLength3740 mm
1705 mmWidth1635 mm
1410 mmHeight1400 mm
1070 KgWeight905 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2300 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 323 and 1999 Toyota Starlet approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…