DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda Demio vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMazda
DemioModel323
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,1 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
170 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
72 HPPower73 HP
105 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
40 ltFuel tank55 lt
7 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3815 mmLength4200 mm
1670 mmWidth1705 mm
1535 mmHeight1410 mm
950 KgWeight1070 Kg
2390 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda Demio and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…