DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 1997 Toyota Corolla Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
323ModelCorolla
2000Model year1997
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,2 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
167 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1332 cc
73 HPPower75 HP
108 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4270 mm
1705 mmWidth1685 mm
1410 mmHeight1380 mm
1070 KgWeight965 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 1997 Toyota Corolla approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…