2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.3 i 16V (73 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Mazda 323 vs 1999 Mitsubishi Colt Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mitsubishi
Colt
Mitsubishi Colt 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
MazdaMakeMitsubishi
323ModelColt
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
14,2 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
167 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
73 HPPower75 HP
108 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/70R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Colt
4200 mmLength3900 mm
1705 mmWidth1680 mm
1410 mmHeight1365 mm
1070 KgWeight945 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2415 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 323 and 1999 Mitsubishi Colt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…