DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 1999 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
MazdaMakeMazda
323Model323
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
14,2 s0–100 km/h14,2 s
167 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
73 HPPower73 HP
108 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 323
4200 mmLength4200 mm
1705 mmWidth1705 mm
1410 mmHeight1410 mm
1070 KgWeight1070 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 1999 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…