DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda 323 vs 1995 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 121
MazdaMakeMazda
323Model121
2000Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 121
14,2 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
167 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
73 HPPower72 HP
108 NmTorque104 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 121
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank43 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 121
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationMazda 121
4200 mmLength3810 mm
1705 mmWidth1655 mm
1410 mmHeight1495 mm
1070 KgWeight815 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda 323 and 1995 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…