DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mazda 323 vs 2000 Kia Rio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Rio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Rio
MazdaMakeKia
323ModelRio
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Rio
14,2 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
167 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1343 cc
73 HPPower75 HP
108 NmTorque113 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Rio
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank45 lt
9,3 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Rio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R13 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 323SpecificationKia Rio
4200 mmLength4215 mm
1705 mmWidth1675 mm
1410 mmHeight1440 mm
1070 KgWeight997 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2410 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mazda 323 and 2000 Kia Rio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Rio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…