1997 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.3 i 16V (73 Hp) 1997Overall Score55.25/100
1997 Mazda 323 vs 1997 Opel Combo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1997 • Opel
Combo
Opel Combo 1.7 D (75 Hp) 1997Overall Score54.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
55.25–54.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
MazdaMakeOpel
323ModelCombo
1997Model year1997
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats2
3Doors3
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
164 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
73 HPPower75 HP
108 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13 STyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationOpel Combo
4035 mmLength4230 mm
1710 mmWidth1686 mm
1405 mmHeight1805 mm
1030 KgWeight—
2505 mmWheelbase2480 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1997 Mazda 323 and 1997 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…