DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Opel Combo vs 1997 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
OpelMakeMazda
ComboModel323
1997Model year1997
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
0 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
75 HPPower73 HP
165 NmTorque108 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Opel ComboSpecificationMazda 323
4230 mmLength4035 mm
1686 mmWidth1710 mm
1805 mmHeight1405 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
2480 mmWheelbase2505 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Opel Combo and 1997 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…