DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeOpel
323ModelVectra
1992Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4/5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
170 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1324 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
73 HPPower82 HP
0 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3996 mmLength4495 mm
1675 mmWidth1707 mm
1379 mmHeight1425 mm
955 KgWeight1260 Kg
2451 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mazda 323 and 1996 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…