DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Opel Vectra vs 1992 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMazda
VectraModel323
1996Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors4/5

Performance

15,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
175 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1686 ccEngine displacement1324 cc
82 HPPower73 HP
168 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption7 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4495 mmLength3996 mm
1707 mmWidth1675 mm
1425 mmHeight1379 mm
1260 KgWeight955 Kg
2637 mmWheelbase2451 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Opel Vectra and 1992 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…