2013 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.3i (260 Hp) 2013Overall Score82.5/100
2013 Mazda 3 vs 2015 Ariel Nomad Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Ariel
Nomad
Ariel Nomad 2.4 (235 Hp) 2015Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
82.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationAriel Nomad
MazdaMakeAriel
3ModelNomad
2013Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats2
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationAriel Nomad
6,1 s0–100 km/h3,4 s
250 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
260 HPPower235 HP
380 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationAriel Nomad
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationAriel Nomad
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/40 R18Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationAriel Nomad
4505 mmLength3215 mm
1770 mmWidth1850 mm
1460 mmHeight1425 mm
1395 KgWeight670 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2348 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mazda 3 and 2015 Ariel Nomad approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…