DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ariel Nomad vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ariel NomadSpecificationMazda 3
ArielMakeMazda
NomadModel3
2015Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ariel NomadSpecificationMazda 3
3,4 s0–100 km/h6,1 s
201 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2354 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
235 HPPower260 HP
300 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ariel NomadSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption13,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ariel NomadSpecificationMazda 3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/75 R15Tyre size225/40 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Ariel NomadSpecificationMazda 3
3215 mmLength4505 mm
1850 mmWidth1770 mm
1425 mmHeight1460 mm
670 KgWeight1395 Kg
2348 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ariel Nomad and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…