DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.5–72.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
Range Rover EvoqueModel3
2016Model year2016
SUV, CrossoverBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
182 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2191 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
54 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption4,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,6 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4371 mmLength4460 mm
1985 mmWidth1795 mm
1660 mmHeight1450 mm
1608 KgWeight1320 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…