2016 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.2 SkyActiv-D (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score72.75/100
2016 Mazda 3 vs 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Land Rover
Range Rover Evoque
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Range 2.0 TD4 (150 Hp) 2016Overall Score72.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
MazdaMakeLand Rover
3ModelRange Rover Evoque
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
8,1 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
210 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2191 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
DieselFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank54 lt
4,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,1 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Range Rover Evoque
4460 mmLength4371 mm
1795 mmWidth1985 mm
1450 mmHeight1660 mm
1320 KgWeight1608 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda 3 and 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…