DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Audi Q3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationAudi Q3
MazdaMakeAudi
3ModelQ3
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationAudi Q3
8,2 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
213 km/hTop speed212 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
185 HPPower170 HP
400 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationAudi Q3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationAudi Q3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationAudi Q3
4460 mmLength4385 mm
1755 mmWidth1831 mm
1470 mmHeight1608 mm
1390 KgWeight1585 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2603 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Audi Q3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…