DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2012 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
Range Rover EvoqueModel3
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
185 km/hTop speed213 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
150 HPPower185 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4460 mm
1965 mmWidth1755 mm
1635 mmHeight1470 mm
1700 KgWeight1390 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2012 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…