DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mazda 3 vs 2012 Ford Tourneo Custom Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Tourneo Custom

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeFord
3ModelTourneo Custom
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats8/9
5Doors5

Performance

8,2 s0–100 km/h—
213 km/hTop speed157 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
185 HPPower155 HP
400 NmTorque385 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,4 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size215/65 R15; 215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4460 mmLength4972 mm
1755 mmWidth1986 mm
1470 mmHeight1827-1984 mm
1390 KgWeight2104 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2933 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mazda 3 and 2012 Ford Tourneo Custom approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Tourneo Custom leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…