2010 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.2 CD (185 Hp) 2010Overall Score73.75/100
2010 Mazda 3 vs 2010 Cadillac BLS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Cadillac
BLS
Cadillac BLS 2.0i 16V Turbo (175) 2010Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationCadillac BLS
MazdaMakeCadillac
3ModelBLS
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationCadillac BLS
8,2 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
213 km/hTop speed220 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
185 HPPower175 HP
400 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationCadillac BLS
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationCadillac BLS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationCadillac BLS
4460 mmLength4680 mm
1755 mmWidth1752 mm
1470 mmHeight1471 mm
1395 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda 3 and 2010 Cadillac BLS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…