DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Cadillac BLS vs 2010 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Cadillac BLSSpecificationMazda 3
CadillacMakeMazda
BLSModel3
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Cadillac BLSSpecificationMazda 3
8,7 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
220 km/hTop speed213 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
175 HPPower185 HP
265 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Cadillac BLSSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
8,1 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Cadillac BLSSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Cadillac BLSSpecificationMazda 3
4680 mmLength4460 mm
1752 mmWidth1755 mm
1471 mmHeight1470 mm
—Weight1395 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Cadillac BLS and 2010 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…