2010 • Mazda
3
Mazda 3 2.2 CD (185 Hp) 2010Overall Score73.75/100
2010 Mazda 3 vs 2010 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 2.2 TD4 (160) 2010Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mazda 3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
MazdaMakeLand Rover
3ModelFreelander
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
8,2 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
213 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
185 HPPower160 HP
400 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size215/75 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 3SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4460 mmLength4500 mm
1755 mmWidth1910 mm
1470 mmHeight1740 mm
1395 KgWeight1770 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2660 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Mazda 3 and 2010 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…