DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda CX-5
MazdaMakeMazda
3ModelCX-5
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda CX-5
10,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
205 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower160 HP
187 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda CX-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda CX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
205/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationMazda CX-5
4460 mmLength4555 mm
1755 mmWidth1840 mm
1470 mmHeight1710 mm
1285 KgWeight1488 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…