DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda CX-5 vs 2013 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
MazdaMakeMazda
CX-5Model3
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,6 s
197 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
208 NmTorque187 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-5SpecificationMazda 3
4555 mmLength4460 mm
1840 mmWidth1755 mm
1710 mmHeight1470 mm
1488 KgWeight1285 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda CX-5 and 2013 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…