DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Mazda 3 vs 2013 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationKia Optima
MazdaMakeKia
3ModelOptima
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationKia Optima
10,6 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
205 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
187 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
55 ltFuel tank65 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption5,9 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationKia Optima
4460 mmLength4845 mm
1755 mmWidth1830 mm
1470 mmHeight1455 mm
1285 KgWeight1587-1648 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Mazda 3 and 2013 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…