DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Mazda 3 vs 2007 Great Wall Cowry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGreat Wall
3ModelCowry
2007Model year2007
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors4

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
187 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption—
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,9 ltAverage consumption9,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/50 R17Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4415 mmLength4574 mm
1755 mmWidth1704 mm
1465 mmHeight1845 mm
1260 KgWeight1510 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Mazda 3 and 2007 Great Wall Cowry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…