DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Great Wall Cowry vs 2007 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMazda
CowryModel3
2007Model year2007
MinivanBody typeHatchback
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
170 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
185 NmTorque187 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption10,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4415 mm
1704 mmWidth1755 mm
1845 mmHeight1465 mm
1510 KgWeight1260 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Great Wall Cowry and 2007 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…