DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mazda 3 vs 2003 Toyota Nadia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Nadia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Nadia
MazdaMakeToyota
3ModelNadia
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Nadia
9,0 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower145 HP
187 NmTorque196 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Nadia
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Nadia
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationToyota Nadia
4420 mmLength4435 mm
1755 mmWidth1695 mm
1465 mmHeight1625 mm
1235 KgWeight1370 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mazda 3 and 2003 Toyota Nadia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Nadia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…