DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Nadia vs 2003 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Nadia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota NadiaSpecificationMazda 3
ToyotaMakeMazda
NadiaModel3
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Toyota NadiaSpecificationMazda 3
—0–100 km/h9,0 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
196 NmTorque187 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota NadiaSpecificationMazda 3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
12 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota NadiaSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota NadiaSpecificationMazda 3
4435 mmLength4420 mm
1695 mmWidth1755 mm
1625 mmHeight1465 mm
1370 KgWeight1235 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Nadia and 2003 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Nadia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…