DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mazda 3 vs 2017 Volvo V90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V90
MazdaMakeVolvo
3ModelV90
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V90
8,2 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
210 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
165 HPPower150 HP
210 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V90
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,5 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V90
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/60 R16; 215/45 R18Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 3SpecificationVolvo V90
4470 mmLength4936 mm
1795 mmWidth1879 mm
1465 mmHeight1475 mm
1230-1316 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2941 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mazda 3 and 2017 Volvo V90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…