DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 SsangYong Korando vs 2017 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

SsangYong Korando

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SsangYongMakeMazda
KorandoModel3
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,2 s
163 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower165 HP
197 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
57 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16; 215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4410 mmLength4470 mm
1830 mmWidth1795 mm
1675 mmHeight1465 mm
1612 KgWeight1230-1316 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 SsangYong Korando and 2017 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, SsangYong Korando leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…